{"id":10249,"date":"2018-05-23T11:07:39","date_gmt":"2018-05-23T10:07:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.worldpolicyconference.com\/?p=10249"},"modified":"2018-07-25T09:26:02","modified_gmt":"2018-07-25T08:26:02","slug":"europe-once-saw-xi-jinping-as-a-hedge-against-trump-not-anymore","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.worldpolicyconference.com\/fr\/europe-once-saw-xi-jinping-as-a-hedge-against-trump-not-anymore\/","title":{"rendered":"Europe Once Saw Xi Jinping as a Hedge Against Trump. Not Anymore."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>March 4, 2018<\/p>\n<p>Steven Erlanger, The New York Times<\/p>\n<p>BRUSSELS \u2014 A year ago, the self-styled global elite gathered at Davos, shaken by the election of Donald J. Trump, who made no secret of his contempt for the multilateral alliances and trade that underpin the European Union.<\/p>\n<p>Then up stepped the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, promising that if America would no longer champion the global system, China would.<\/p>\n<p>European officials and business leaders were thrilled.<\/p>\n<p>But a year later, European leaders are confronted with the reality that Mr. Xi could also be a threat to the global system, rather than a great defender. The abolition of the two-term limit for the presidency, which could make Mr. Xi China\u2019s ruler for life and which is expected to be ratified this week by China\u2019s legislature, has punctured the hope that China would become \u201ca responsible stakeholder\u201d in the global order. Few still believe China is moving toward the Western values of democracy and rule of law.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, many European leaders now accuse China of trying to divide the European Union as it woos Central Europe and the Balkan states with large investments. They are also wary of how China has become more aggressive militarily, in espionage and in its investment strategy abroad\u2014 with targets including its largest trading partner in Europe, Germany.<\/p>\n<p>For decades the European Union has benefited from the global system created by the United States after World War II, as has China. Even as Russia under President Vladimir V. Putin has remained a revanchist power, trying to destabilize the bloc and win back territories lost in the Cold War, China\u2019s economic success has depended on stability and order \u2014 which benefited Europe, too.<\/p>\n<p>But the prospect of Mr. Xi as ruler in perpetuity has scrambled the equation. Many European leaders distrust Mr. Trump, who says he sees them less as allies than as competitors. But if moving closer to China once seemed like a smart hedge, at least while Mr. Trump was in office, now Mr. Xi also presents a problem \u2014 and he may not be going away.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re at an inflection point,\u201d said Orville Schell, director of the Center on U.S.-China Relations at the Asia Society. \u201cThe Western world now understands that we have to take China\u2019s push out into the world much more seriously than we have in the past.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Trump\u2019s declaration that he will impose stinging tariffs on imported steel will hurt Europe more than China, another example of how Europe is getting caught between Washington and Beijing.<\/p>\n<p>European political leaders were already growing wary of Chinese intentions, especially given the vacuum of foreign policy leadership from the Trump administration and the persistent meddling from Russia. Last month, Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel of Germany warned that China was pursuing its own model of world order and attempting \u201cto put a Chinese stamp on the world and impose a Chinese system, a real global system but not like ours, based on human rights and individual liberties.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Gabriel was especially concerned about China\u2019s \u201cOne Belt, One Road\u201d initiative, a huge infrastructure project promoted by Mr. Xi to expand Chinese power by developing new trade routes, including in Europe. To expedite this, Beijing has created the \u201c16 plus 1\u201d group, which brings China together with 16 European nations, 11 of them members of the European Union and the rest from the western Balkans.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf we don\u2019t succeed in developing a single strategy toward China,\u201d said Mr. Gabriel in an earlier speech, \u201cthen China will succeed in dividing Europe.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>At the time, some regarded his remarks as alarmist. Less so now. Despite Germany\u2019s huge exports to China and investment there \u2014 China is Germany\u2019s largest trading partner, with two-way trade last year of $230 billion \u2014 even the German ambassador in Beijing, Michael Clauss, has openly criticized China\u2019s policies and domestic repression, a marked change from years of German silence.<\/p>\n<p>Chinese companies have also made waves by buying a major German machine-tool and robotics company, Kuka, and then trying to buy a key semiconductor company, Aixtron. The latter bid was blocked by American objections on security grounds. The sudden purchase last week of nearly 10 percent of Daimler, the iconic German car manufacturer, by a much smaller Chinese car company, Geely, has also raised hackles, and questions about where the money, some $9 billion, really comes from.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s a highly public discussion about Chinese influence in Germany,\u201d said Angela Stanzel, an Asia expert at the European Council on Foreign Relations. \u201cThere have been 10 times as many articles about Daimler than about Xi prolonging his rule.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Berlin and Brussels have been shaken amid concerns that the real intent of Beijing\u2019s \u201cOne Belt, One Road\u201d program is as much political as economic.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe main worry was China\u2019s divide-and-rule policy,\u201d Ms. Stanzel said. \u201cThe new worry is that because China is trying to make this format work, it will invest less effort and money into its relationship with Brussels.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Both Germany and France have been pushing the European Commission, the bloc\u2019s executive branch, to draw up stricter investment screening regulations to better protect European companies and European security. Europe will have to find a new China strategy, Ms. Stanzel added, one free of any illusions, \u201cbecause now we\u2019re sure we\u2019ll have Xi for the rest of his life.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Minxin Pei, a China scholar at Claremont McKenna College, said China\u2019s actions in Europe, much like in the South China Sea, \u201chave a probing quality, to test where the weaknesses are and where the pushback is.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Trade is only part of the overall security and geopolitical picture, he said, noting that Mr. Xi may be pushing too hard, too fast and that \u201cthis grandiose vision and ruthless actions are a bit premature.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Politically, the European Union has been troubled by convulsions in recent years as far-right parties have challenged the political establishment, while leaders in Poland and Hungary are challenging democratic norms. No European leader confused China with being an emerging democracy, yet analysts say many Western officials hoped and assumed the Chinese system would gradually become more like the democratic West.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t know who is still fooling themselves about convergence and liberalization \u2014 Xi put an end to that long ago,\u201d Fran\u00e7ois Godement, a China scholar at Sciences Po in Paris. \u201cOfficial China has been increasingly frank about a systematic competition with democracies.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>By now, European leaders are accustomed to dealing with Mr. Putin and Russia. Mr. Xi is very different, says Susan Shirk, an expert on Chinese politics who served in the Clinton administration.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile Putin wants to be a spoiler, Xi wants to be respected as a global leader,\u201d said Ms. Shirk, who is now director of the 21st Century China Center at the University of California, San Diego. \u201cHe hasn\u2019t tried to subvert the structures that exist. But he has recently started to build his own.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>With China returning to a more Leninist system, \u201cwe still don\u2019t know what that will mean for global governance,\u201d she said, \u201cespecially with Trump abdicating and trashing it.\u201d Still, she said, the world must engage with China to get Mr. Xi \u201cto fulfill his ambitions in the context of existing structures, and not overreact every time China takes the initiative.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For Europe, the prospect of China as a strategic competitor, as well as a political competitor, is a major challenge. \u201cEurope is so disaggregated and so lacking in fortitude that its countries don\u2019t think like big leaders,\u201d said Mr. Schell. \u201cAmerica always has, but with Trump we\u2019ve gone missing, and nature abhors a vacuum.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Now Mr. Xi\u2019s open-ended tenure could give China a chance to plan long-term and carry out its policies systematically with \u201ca steady hand on the helm of a great power,\u201d Mr. Schell said. \u201cBut it is rooted in Leninism, autocracy and control, which will make it a tremendous challenge for liberal democracies rooted in a different value system, especially in a world reeling with no leadership.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>March 4, 2018 Steven Erlanger, The New York Times BRUSSELS \u2014 A year ago, the self-styled global elite gathered at Davos, shaken by the election of Donald J. Trump, who<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":10250,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10249","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news-room"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.worldpolicyconference.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10249","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.worldpolicyconference.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.worldpolicyconference.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.worldpolicyconference.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.worldpolicyconference.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10249"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.worldpolicyconference.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10249\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.worldpolicyconference.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10250"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.worldpolicyconference.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10249"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.worldpolicyconference.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10249"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.worldpolicyconference.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10249"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}