Emmanuel Macron\u2019s deal with the far left may end up being far worse for France than if the National Rally had won the parliamentary elections.<\/p>\n
Emmanuel Macron\u00a0is self-confident and ambitious. His focus is not limited to leading France; he also aims to establish himself as the\u00a0leader of Europe\u00a0and a\u00a0major global player. Ideologically, he is very adaptable \u2013 like a snake, he does not hesitate to change his skin. He has cunningly succeeded in gaining the label of \u201cliberal,\u201d even though his actions and beliefs do not match that moniker.<\/p>\n
A European liberal believes in limited state involvement, a market economy, decentralization, balanced public finances and a high degree of individual responsibility. Mr. Macron\u2019s policies, with his support for European centralization, central economic planning by the state, common European debt, and similar philosophies, are rather closer to socialism.<\/p>\n
His adaptable tactics have allowed him to succeed personally and politically. However, a lack of performance and truthfulness has led to a loss of trust and has backfired on him.<\/p>\n
Like many other European leaders, most of whom are weak and underperforming, he has championed a hypocritical \u201cdefense of democracy.\u201d According to this idea, right-wing parties, created in response to the center\u2019s shift toward socialism, are labeled anti-democratic and must be excluded. Voters, however, do not believe that this stance by itself ought to legitimize political rule.<\/p>\n